食品新闻中心
News
植物 您的位置: 首页 > 产品中心 > 植物
亚搏网app_FIFA名哨谈沈寅豪争议判罚!点球不存在,巴坎布是主动假摔
发布人: 薇草食品 来源: 薇草食品公司 发布时间: 2021-03-15 12:02:02

亚搏网app_FIFA名哨谈沈寅豪争议判罚!点球不存在,巴坎布是主动假摔

Some time ago, the 2-2 draw in the first round of the Beijing-Luzhou match in the second stage of the Chinese Super League caused a lot of controversy. The referee Shen Yinhao’s sentence was also complained by fans. Some excited fans texted him and even picked it up. Shen Yinhao's paper was suspected of plagiarism and other things. Unexpectedly, in the second stage of the Chinese Super League, the referee is the most stealthy. Keith Hackett also commented on Shen Yinhao’s controversial penalty in the Jinglu battle. What needs to be said is that Keith Hackett is not a small person. It is the most senior first batch of Premier League referees, the top 100 referees in FIFA history and other honorary titles.

前段亚搏游戏下载app时间,中超联赛第二阶段的北京-uzhou州比赛第一轮2-2平局引起了很多争议。裁判沉银浩的判决也受到球迷的抱怨。一些激动的粉丝给他发短信,甚至捡起它。沉银浩的论文涉嫌窃等。没想到,在中国超级联赛的第二阶段,裁判是最隐秘的。基思·哈克特(Keith Hackett)还评论了申银皓在靖路大战中受到争议的刑罚。需要说的是,基思·哈克特(Keith Hackett)并非小人物。它是英超联赛裁判中最资深的第一批裁判,也是FIFA历史上排名前100位的裁判和其他荣誉头衔。

Keith Hackett commented that Shandong Luneng was penalized less than 1 minute from the start of the second half when he commented on the Jinglu battle. It was wrong. His remarks were "

基思·哈克特(Keith Hackett)评论说,山东鲁能在下半场比赛开始后不到1分钟的时间里受到处罚。那是错的。他的话是“

In addition to this penalty, Keith Hackett felt that it should not be penalized. It was also wrong for Beijing Guoan to be sentenced to a penalty kick in the first half. Keith Hackett used the rules to speak directly. He said that he must read the latest before judging. Version of the "Football Rules" manual, item 12 when talking about handball penalty

除了这项处罚外,基思·哈克特(Keith Hackett)认为不应对此亚搏游戏下载app进行处罚。北京国安在上半场被判罚点球也是错误的。 Keith Hackett使用规则直接讲话。他说,他必须在评审前阅读最新的文章。 《足球亚搏游戏下载app规则》手册的版本,谈论手球罚球时的第12项

According to Keith Hackett, the two controversial penalties made by the referee Shen Yinhao were wrong. Shandong Luneng’s penalty kick hit Bacambu’s arm, and Bacambu was slightly more in the second half. He fell to the ground after the contact, Keith Hackett bluntly said that he has active diving elements, so he should not give a penalty.

根据基思·哈克特(Keith Hackett)的说法,裁判沉银浩提出的两项有争议的处罚是错误的。山东鲁能的点球大战击中了Bacambu的手臂,下半场Bacambu的得分稍高。接触后他倒地,基思·哈克特(Keith Hackett)直言不讳地说他具有活跃的潜水元素,因此他不应该给予任何惩罚。

Of course, many fans also said that although Bakambu’s handball did not face the ball, it did expand the defensive area because of his open arms. It must be a penalty. But what Keith Hackett said was based on the latest version of "Football The rules are defined, so it is really different from what some fans imagine.

当然,许多球迷还说,尽管巴卡姆布的手球没有面对球,但由于他张开双臂,确实扩大了防守区域。这一定是惩罚。但是基思·哈克特(Keith Hackett)所说的是基于“足球规则”的最新版本,因此它确实与某些球迷的想象不同。

Copyright © 2016 All Rights Reserved 版权所有· 亚搏游戏下载app—亚搏网app